4,001 → 2,416 FUE
LICENSE COUNT CORRECTED VIA SAP STAR REPORT VALIDATION
RIZEN TECHNOLOGIES LLP
SOFTWARE LICENSING & CONTRACT ADVISORS
CLIENT SUCCESS STORY
SAP RISE CONTRACT OPTIMIZATION & NEGOTIATION
CASE STUDY — SAP RISE CONTRACT OPTIMIZATION & NEGOTIATION
How correcting an oversized FUE license count, optimizing the Bill of Materials, resetting the project plan, and benchmarking discounts and hyperscaler incentives turned an oversized SAP RISE proposal into a right-sized, fully negotiated 5-year contract.
$10M Saved
4,001 → 2,416 FUE
LICENSE COUNT CORRECTED VIA SAP STAR REPORT VALIDATION
49% → 65%+
TARGET DISCOUNT BENCHMARKED ACROSS KEY SKUS
~40%
REDUCTION IN FUE LICENSE COUNT FROM SAP'S ORIGINAL SIZING
$300K+
HYPERSCALER CLOUD INCENTIVES NEGOTIATED TO OFFSET SI COSTS
12–15 Mo
REALISTIC TIMELINE VALIDATED VS. AN UNACHIEVABLE RUSHED PLAN
Multiple
BOM SKUS REMOVED, DEFERRED OR RE-PHASED
Client Snapshot: A large global automotive manufacturing group migrating its core SAP ECC environment to SAP RISE (S/4HANA Cloud, Private Edition) ahead of SAP's 2027 ECC support deadline.
SAP proposed a RISE contract sized on a Full Use Equivalent (FUE) count of 4,001 licenses and an aggressive Bluefield migration timeline, without independent validation of actual usage, Bill of Materials fit, or achievable discounting — leaving the client exposed to paying for licenses, SKUs, and a project schedule it didn't actually need.
Rizen ran a full-lifecycle optimization of the client's SAP RISE proposal — correctly valuing and crediting the client's existing on-prem entitlements into the new contract, right-sizing the FUE band using SAP's own STAR report methodology, optimizing the Bill of Materials line by line, resetting the project plan and cost allocation to a realistic timeline, benchmarking target discounts, and negotiating hyperscaler incentives — before negotiating every key contractual term directly with SAP.
$10M saved across the 5-year RISE contract: full-lifecycle optimization — from sizing through final negotiation — cut the total cost of the client's SAP RISE migration by $10M.
A realistic project timeline protected the contract from rush costs: Rizen's assessment showed the originally proposed go-live was unachievable given the environment's complexity, and reset the plan to a realistic 12–15 month schedule before it could inflate the TCO.
FUE count corrected from 4,001 to 2,416: Rizen used SAP's own STAR report process to validate actual usage, removing licenses the original proposal never should have counted.
Target discounts benchmarked and negotiated up: Rizen benchmarked achievable discount levels against comparable RISE deals and negotiated key SKUs to a materially higher target discount range.
On-prem entitlements converted to Full Use Equivalent credit: existing on-prem licenses were properly valued and credited into the RISE contract, rather than the client paying twice for capacity it already owned.
Hyperscaler incentives brought in to offset implementation costs: Rizen negotiated cloud investment credits and rebates from the client's hyperscaler, worth an estimated $300K or more, to help offset systems integrator costs.
Bill of Materials optimized SKU by SKU: lower-priority SKUs were removed or deferred where the business case didn't support immediate purchase, and usage-metric ramp-ups were re-phased to match the actual rollout.
Every key contractual term negotiated directly with SAP: price protection, audit rights, and surrender-value credit for shelfware on the retiring on-prem contract were all secured as part of the final agreement.
Get an independent FUE and Bill of Materials review before you sign.